It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s a… defibrillator?

Yep, here it comes to save the day! Alec Momont, a graduate student at Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) in the Netherlands, created the Ambulance Drone project. Their intent was to develop a drone that would deliver life-saving equipment like an Automated External Defibrillator (AED), medicines, and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) aids to the scene of an emergency. The first drone prototype focused on delivering an AED. They created a compact, lightweight drone (using 3-D printed microstructures and a carbon fiber frame) that flies 100 kilometers per hour and reduces the average emergency response time from 10 minutes to one minute (in the European Union).

According to the American Heart Association,

Immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation, with an automated external defibrillator (AED), can more than double a victim’s chance of survival. In fact, early defibrillation, along with CPR, is the only way to restore the victim’s heart rhythm to normal in a lot of cases of cardiac arrest. For every minute that passes without CPR and defibrillation, however, the chances of survival decrease by 7–10%. A recent study sponsored in part by the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Association shows that most cardiac arrests that occur in public places are “shockable” arrhythmias or those that respond to a shock from an AED, making AEDs in public places highly valuable. Yet, there are not enough AEDs and persons trained in using them and performing CPR to provide this lifesaving treatment, resulting in lost opportunities to save more lives.

Hopefully, drones like this one will turn those lost opportunities into life-saving events because the developers incorporated “a two-way, video supported, communication channel in the drone” that allows the 1-1-2 emergency operator and the person there at the scene to communicate. The emergency operator is then able to provide step-by-step instructions on how to use the AED.

Where are they at in development? According to TU Delft, “The complex nature of a systems innovation like this makes commercial exploitation, not an easy task. TU Delft is considering further steps in the development.”

Watch the video to see how it works:

You can read more about the Ambulance Drone project here

Filed in categories: News

Tagged: ,

It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s a… defibrillator? originally appeared on The Gadgeteer on August 31, 2017 at 9:00 am.

Note: If you are subscribed to this feed through FeedBurner, please switch to our native feed URL http://the-gadgeteer.com/feed/ in order to ensure continuous delivery.

This fitness tracker may soon be iconic, the Fitbit Ionic

The fitness tracker wars seem to be heating up again. Misfit is releasing a new fitness tracker this summer and now Fitbit is releasing the Ionic fitness tracker which is designed to cut into the Apple Watch market. 

With a built in heart rate monitor, sleep tracking, built in GPS, and water resistance of up to 50 meters, the Ionic is setting itself up to be a top contender in the fitness tracker market. Powered by a Lithium-polymer battery, the Ionic has a 4+ day battery life with the ability to fully recharge in about two hours.

The Ionic will sync with Mac OS X 10.6 and up, Apple iPhone 4S and later, iPad 3 generation and later, and Windows 10 devices. Fitbit is taking pre-orders for the Ionic with the base model starting at $299.99. With the fitness tracker wars heating up let’s see if Fitbit can land the first decisive shot.

Filed in categories: News

Tagged: ,

This fitness tracker may soon be iconic, the Fitbit Ionic originally appeared on The Gadgeteer on August 28, 2017 at 12:00 pm.

Note: If you are subscribed to this feed through FeedBurner, please switch to our native feed URL http://the-gadgeteer.com/feed/ in order to ensure continuous delivery.

Fitbit Alta HR review

I’m new to the world of Fitbit and its wearable fitness trackers. What got me interested in trying a Fitbit was my wife’s company was doing a fundraiser for charity based on steps with the leading team being able to donate to the cause of their choice. Spouses were allowed/encouraged to join in on the fun and since I wanted to get in better shape I wholeheartedly agreed. I don’t typically wear a fitness tracker or smartwatch, preferring a classic timepiece on my wrist. So, the Alta HR’s sleek and slim form factor appealed to me; allowing me to wear my watch on my left wrist and the unobtrusive Fitbit on my right. For this review, Fitbit sent me their stealthy Special Edition gunmetal Alta HR to try out. 

Note: Photos may be tapped or clicked for a larger image.

The Alta HR is one of the slimmest and most stylish fitness trackers on the market today. The HR is a follow on to the original Alta adding Fitbit’s PurePulse heart rate sensor, quite a feat considering the device’s tiny size.  In addition to built-in heart rate monitor, the Alta HR has an OLED display, 7-day battery life, all-day fitness tracking, sleep tracking with Fitbit’s new Sleep Stages and Sleep Insights feature, notification mirroring, etc.

In the Box:

  • Alta HR fitness tracker
  • USB charging cable
  • Instructions

Like the device itself, what you receive in the box is relatively simplistic…fitness tracker, charging cable, and a few pages of instructions.

Getting the Alta HR operational is more about getting your Fitbit account setup and signed into the app than anything on the device side of the house. Once charged and paired to your smartphone, the device syncs with the app and you’re more or less good to go.

Design:

Like the original, the Alta HR has a plastic body surrounded by a metal frame with a 1.4 inch, 128 x 36 resolution OLED touchscreen display on top. The display is monochrome with decent contrast, though sometimes difficult to see in bright/sunny conditions. The Alta has a buttonless design; its “Single Point Touch Screen” allows you to navigate the fitness tracker’s various screens by tapping its front face. The display is off until you either raise your wrist to look at it or double-tap it.  Approximately 3/4 of the time it correctly senses the wrist-raise motion, but the remaining times I would have to double-tap the screen to bring it to life. It did take a bit of initial practice to get the screen to respond. At first, I found the interface quite irritating with how unresponsive it was but with time I finally got the hang of it or the mechanism itself needed to be broken in. Either way, the device is currently responding well to screen taps with perhaps 10% of the time needing to repeat the effort.

This pic does a good job showing off the heart rate sensor and charging port on the back of the Alta HR.

The Alta HR charges via its propitiatory USB cable that clamps onto the back of the tracker, locking it into place. The Alta HR charges relatively quickly (within a few hours) and operates nearly a week without needing to be recharged.

Setup:

Like other Fitbit fitness trackers, configuring the Alta HR is done via the smartphone app. The pairing and setup process is quick and easy. Considering how small the screen is, Fitbit has done a good job optimizing what and how your fitness data is displayed. Being able to see your steps and heart rate on the fly is convenient and helps keep you motivated.

Though getting an in-depth workout analysis comes when you open up the Fitbit app and can see a multitude of data sets.

Functions:

As you can see above, the Alta HR tracks steps, estimated distance traveled, calories burned, and sleep quality; plus it nags you to move if you have been sedentary too long. I found all of the Fitbit’s features very motivating, especially during the fitness competition. There is no doubt that between the two, I regularly hit 20k steps and beyond during the challenge.

Like its predecessor, the Alta HR auto-scenes what type of workout you’re doing and records them as blocks of effort. Though it did get a little confused with tennis but was spot on when I ran, walked, or did the elliptical machine. The Fitbit app keeps track of not only the type of exercising you’re doing but its duration, calories burned, average heart rate, and type of exertion (aka burning fat/cardio/peak). With more data within each workout for greater in-depth analysis as seen on the right screen capture.

I found the heart rate data pretty accurate. When I compared my heart rate count to the grips on my elliptical machine, the Fitbit was within 2-5 beats/minute of the workout machine’s. I was also pleased with my resting heart rate ( a good indicator of overall health) regularly at or below 60 bpm.

Fitbit’s new sleep tracking is my favorite and most interesting feature of the Alta HR. I firmly believe that a good nights sleep is a key component to staying healthy and motivated. I shoot for 8 hours a sleep per night but rarely achieve it. In addition to tracking the duration and type of sleep, the tracking feature helped me realize lifestyle choices that impacted the quality of rest I was getting on any given night.

When paired with and in range of your smartphone, the Alta will also display notifications of incoming calls, text messages, calendar alerts, and will provide reminders (aka nagging) to get up and move throughout the day. These notifications can be difficult to read due to the small display but at least let you know they’re there and to reference your phone if need be. I also like vibration on my wrist for calls, messages, and alarms cause there are many times I have my iPhone on silent and miss them.

A few features that would be nice to have:

  • Altimeter
  • Physical button similar to the Charge 2
  • Waterproofing (vs just being sweat proof)

I do quite a few stairs during the average week. Whether I’m walking from the bus tunnel to work or running the stairs in our building during lunch, it would be nice to track stairs climbed in addition to just steps taken. But in my case, it is a minor issue compared to wearing a larger device to gain that feature.

The Fitbit Alta HR is available in Black/Stainless Steel, Blue Gray/Stainless Steel, Fuchsia/Stainless Steel, Coral/Stainless Steel, Black/Gunmetal, and Soft Pink/Rose Gold. Fitbit leather accessory bands are available in Brown, Indigo, and Lavender. There is also a Stainless Steel option as well.

In addition to the stock Fitbit bands, there are MANY aftermarket Alta bands out there to express yourself. The Alta HR is engineered to swap bands in a blink of an eye. The design makes it quick and easy to exchange bands whenever you please.

I really like the Alta HR’s slim, stealthy design with the Special Edition gunmetal version definitely being my fitness tracker of choice. Fitbit has done an excellent job creating a less is more fitness band that is comfortable to wear with solid features and specs. While the HR is lacking a few nice to have features, its form factor, heart rate tracking, accurate activity tracking, excellent sleep tracking, week-long battery life, and stellar app platform/ecosystem more than makeup for it.

Source: The sample for this review was provided by Fitbit. Please visit their site for more info and Amazon to order.

 

Product Information

Price: $149.95 / $179.95 (Special Edition as reviewed)
Manufacturer: Fitbit
Retailer: Amazon
Pros:
  • Slim & stylish form factor
  • Excellent app & fitness ecosystem
  • Solid build quality
  • Does basic features well
  • Sweat-proof
  • Easy to swap out bands
Cons:
  • Expensive
  • Lacking a few nice-to-have features

Filed in categories: Reviews

Tagged: ,

Fitbit Alta HR review originally appeared on The Gadgeteer on August 24, 2017 at 11:15 am.

Note: If you are subscribed to this feed through FeedBurner, please switch to our native feed URL http://the-gadgeteer.com/feed/ in order to ensure continuous delivery.

Color Doctor Blood Pressure Monitor Review

        

The Color Doctor is an “As Seen On TV” product that promises a better solution for quick, easy home monitoring of your heart rate and blood pressure. It’s certainly as easy to use (and read) as advertised. But is it worth purchasing? Let’s go find out!

A Caution about Wrist-Based Blood Pressure Monitors

Before we begin, we should talk a little bit about monitoring your blood pressure. High blood pressure runs in my family, so I’ve done a bit of research on this subject.

The Color Doctor is designed to wrap around your wrist, as opposed to your upper arm. For an accurate reading, you should sit with your elbow resting on a table and the unit held parallel to the level of your heart. Organizations like the Mayo Clinic and the American Heart Association do not consider wrist monitors to be as accurate as traditional upper-arm cuffs. They are much more sensitive to body position and tend to show a higher reading than an upper-arm monitor (because the arteries in your wrist are closer to the skin, affecting the measurement).

Does this mean that wrist monitors are bad? No. Some of us can’t use upper-arm monitors for a variety of reasons. You just need to be aware that the readings may be different than what you’ll see on professional equipment at the doctor’s office. As with anything health-related, be sure to check with your doctor if you’re going to do home blood pressure monitoring. Take your monitor with you on your next visit, and have your doctor show you the best way to use it. He or she can also calibrate the readings against the office equipment so that you understand how to properly interpret the readings at home. Knowledge is power, folks. Be smart and be safe.

Got it? Cool. Now back to the review!

Construction and Design

The Color Doctor is a compact, lightweight piece of equipment. The unit and cuff weigh about 4 ounces and fit nicely into the included 3″ by 3″ by 3″ plastic storage case. The size and weight make it very easy to stash in your dresser drawer or medicine cabinet, and it takes up very little room if you’re packing it for travel. 

You’ll find a big digital screen on the face, below which are positioned a large blue start/stop button, and a smaller white memory button. There are some tiny labels on the sides of the screen to indicate the digital readings; while they are hard to read, you won’t need them once you start using the unit (as we’ll see below). The buttons themselves are big and friendly with a little raised surface, so they are easy to operate.

One-handed attachment is easy and drama-free. The back of the unit is contoured to fit the shape of your wrist. The short side of the cuff (to the right of the unit) is rigid and curved so that it “hooks” into the proper position on to your wrist, after which you wrap the loose side of the cuff around to the desired tightness and secure it with the velcro on the strap. This is a nice design feature, especially for those that may have issues with manual dexterity: it’s pretty much foolproof for one-handed operation.

While the Color Doctor is certainly easy to operate, the construction is pretty average. Assembly looks pretty good, with no obvious faults in seams or stitching. Materials feel like budget-grade plastics and fabrics. Given that this a light-use kind of device, this may not be a big deal… but you’ll want to keep it in its protective storage case when not in use.

The Color Doctor uses two “AAA” alkaline batteries, which are not included in the purchase. They’re installed via a snap panel on the back of the unit.

The Color Doctor is really simple to use. Get yourself in the proper position, wrap the unit around your wrist, and press the blue start/stop button. The unit will buzz while the cuff inflates, and the readings are displayed in about a minute or so.

The biggest strength of the Color Doctor is its easy-to-read display. Systolic pressure is found on the upper-right quadrant of the screen, diastolic pressure on the lower right, and current heart rate on the lower left. The screen changes color based on the results: green for “normal” levels (120/80 systolic/diastolic pressures), yellow for “prehypertensive” (up to 139/89), and red for “hypertensive” (over 140/90). The screen is bright, and and the numbers are large with good contrast against the screen. After a recent workout, I took readings during my cool down period to show how the color indicator changes based on the results. You can see how easy it is to read in pictures below:

As you can see, the display is really impressive. Even in low-light conditions or for those who may have issues with their vision, the combination of color reinforcement and big numbers makes it easy to see what your reading looks like. Combined with the ease of attachment and simple button design, it’s a great tool for getting a fast blood pressure reading.

Additional Features

The Color Doctor has several additional features. You can set the date and time, and toggle between two different users. When you take a new reading, the results are automatically saved for the last user selected. It will save the last 90 readings and has a memory recall feature that allows you to review the average of the last three readings or cycle through the history of readings for the last user.

Access to these settings and features gets really clunky because there are only two buttons to work with. Do you remember those old-school two-button digital watches, with all the features that were activated by some combination of pressing or holding the buttons? It’s a lot like that. Honestly, I tried to document all of the variations for the review and gave up due to the complexity if it all. You’ll need the manual to sort it all out.

Conclusions and Pricing

In a lot of ways, the Color Doctor Blood Pressure Monitor delivers on its “As Seen on TV” promotional messaging. It’s easy to use and operate. The screen is bright, and the results are clear. The color-changing display adds a nice level of visual reinforcement that will be especially valuable for those that may have vision issues. On the down side, the additional features are difficult to work with and, in some cases, downright frustrating.

In my mind, the bigger issue with the Color Doctor is the $39.99 retail price. There are a lot of competitive products in this space; a quick search on Amazon yields a bunch of wrist monitors that range in price from $15 to $50. After spending some time looking at customer reviews for these products, I’m not sure that the Color Doctor distinguishes itself significantly against these products. If the ease of use and bold color display are important to you, you won’t be unhappy with this purchase… you may want to shop around a bit first, though.

The Color Doctor retails for $39.99 and is available for direct purchase at their web site.

Source: The sample for this review was provided by BulbHead. For more information, visit their web site.

 

Product Information

Price: $39.99
Manufacturer: Color Doctor
Retailer: BulbHead
Pros:
  • Blood pressure reading are quick and easy
  • Bright, easy-to-read display
  • Color indicator provides nice visual reinforcement
  • Nice compact package for storage or travel (includes storage case)
Cons:
  • Materials and construction are average
  • Additional features are difficult to use

Filed in categories: Reviews

Tagged:

Color Doctor Blood Pressure Monitor Review originally appeared on The Gadgeteer on August 21, 2017 at 9:00 am.

Note: If you are subscribed to this feed through FeedBurner, please switch to our native feed URL http://the-gadgeteer.com/feed/ in order to ensure continuous delivery.

Nima Portable Gluten Sensor review

I have celiac disease, an inherited autoimmune condition that affects about one in every 100 people. When I eat gluten – think pizza, pasta, bread, cake and cookies – my body revolts against the enemy intruder and starts attacking itself, resulting in a number of seemingly unrelated and ugly reactions from which I’ll spare you a description. But let’s just say some involve the gut.

People will sometimes offer me food they insist is safe for me (which, according to the FDA, is less than 20 parts per million), and sometimes I end up experiencing a variety of effects – some immediate, some less so, but all unpleasant and potentially contributing to premature mortality. This can happen at a get-together or at a restaurant.

So I was thrilled to be able to review the Nima Portable Gluten Sensor, a compact device that allows you to test for gluten. The unit, which retails for $279, comes with three test vials, a micro-USB recharging cable and a carrying pouch, which fits in a purse or pocket. I was given an extra 12 vials for review purposes.

The unit measures 3.5 inches wide and 3.1 inches high and has Bluetooth connectivity so it can sync to your smartphone. Users can contribute their test results to the Nima community using a free Nima app, which also provides a list of Nima-tested restaurants. That all was great when I paired my Nima with the phone I had initially, but the unit would not pair with my replacement phone a couple of weeks later, greatly limiting my ability to be part of the online Nima community where test results are shared.

To test for the presence of gluten, users put a tiny sample of food – liquid or solid – into a vial and insert the vial into the device. In three minutes – a theoretical estimation because my test times amounted to more like five minutes – a wheat icon and a “gluten detected” warning will warn users if their food is not safe to consume; a smile icon gives diners the go-ahead.

The unit and single-use vials use a combination of chemistry and sensors. Subscriptions are available for $59.95 per month for 12 capsules or $61.95 for 12 vials every other month. Those who eat restaurant or processed food often can opt for the $116.94, 24-capsule plan per month, trusting if they can afford to eat out all the time, they can afford the subscription cost. Some foods – soy sauce, pure vinegar, beer, or alcohol – cannot be tested, leaving diners to make educated judgment calls before consumption. The unit also is glitchy with frozen foods such as ice cream, but we’ll get to that in a bit.

For those who are pretty good at math, the ongoing cost comes out to roughly $5 a vial. That $5 vial allows you to test a sample about half the size of a pea. So forget the notion of trying to test a mixture of your entrée and sides. You’ll do well to fit a whole grain of rice in the vial, which means you could go through three vials to test an entire plate of food at a restaurant. Don’t even consider testing your way through a buffet line unless you have very deep pockets and a whole lot of time.

I also discovered the device is very sensitive and prone to capsule errors. My first test was a gluten-free roll at Cooper’s Hawk Winery, one of my favorite restaurants for its extensive and delicious gluten-free menu. I have never reacted to anything I’ve eaten there, but I decided to test the roll as an academic exercise. I only had one capsule with me, and I got a “capsule error” warning. I ate the roll anyway and didn’t get sick.

A couple of days later, I made my homemade cornbread using Quaker yellow cornmeal. (The only other ingredients are oil, salt, baking powder, baking soda, buttermilk and egg.) I successfully tested the finished product and got a smiley face icon. And I happily ate.

However, I received another capsule error when I tried to test my steak salad at Longhorn Steakhouse. This might have been a result of the difficulty in reducing my salad to a half-pea-sized test sample. Fortunately, I had better luck at Bonefish Grill, where my Chilean sea bass with mango salsa tested safe. My birthday dinner at PF Changs – the gluten-free Hokkien Street Noodles – also earned a smiley face from my Nima unit and my belly, as did my mushroom truffle pizza at Uncle Maddio’s Pizza during the continuation of my birthday celebration.

My husband had bought me a strawberry birthday cake made by Inspired by Happiness. Though that was marked gluten-free, I tested it anyway and was happy to learn it was safe. I also tested the Talenti double dark chocolate gelato he bought for me, only to receive a capsule error after waiting five minutes for results – longer than it actually took me to eat the gelato.

However, a few days later – or a few days too late, depending on your perspective – an email from Nima addressed the capsule errors that were occurring when testing ice cream. The company suggested a smaller sample size with a drop of water. I realized it would have to be a very small sample and a very small drop.

So I decided to test Talenti’s mango gelato (because the chocolate had inexplicably disappeared) using the updated testing parameters. I even waited a couple of minutes to begin the test while I photographed what the sample looked like. But this time I got no results whatsoever. Crickets. And when I pushed the start button a second time, I, of course, got a capsule error.

Here’s a case in which my Nima saved the day. One of my husband’s coworkers sent him home with a box of dark chocolate truffles from a Ukrainian company called LVIV Handmade Chocolates. I’m all about dark chocolate all day long (and this may incriminate me regarding the chocolate gelato), but I don’t speak or read Ukrainian and couldn’t decipher the ingredients list. I cut a sliver of truffle and put it into my Nima. Five minutes later, the smiley face icon told me my pig-out session was about to begin. Sometimes it’s the little things.

 

But let’s talk about a case in which my Nima truly saved the day. I met some ladies at a local BJ’s Restaurant & Brewhouse to celebrate a friend’s birthday. My friends had me choose the restaurant so I could be ensured a wide variety of selections. I ordered a gluten-free chicken-bacon-ranch pizza, which looked and tasted amazing. But I began to notice my mouth, which is prone to blisters when exposed to gluten, began feeling weird, so I pulled out my Nima and tested a piece of the cheese-covered crust. A few minutes later, I got a new icon: low gluten with a wheat stalk. In my hunger and impatience, I had already eaten one piece of the pizza. The rest went back to the kitchen and was replaced with salad.

The technology has tremendous applications and promise, but it’s still glitchy, and the cost is burdensome. It also can be difficult to get food into the capsule. Including tiny disposable tweezers or a sample-sized scoop would help, but that, no doubt, would only add to the cost.

As one who cooks from scratch and typically doesn’t eat out a ton, I will not become a monthly subscriber just yet, but I will pack my Nima with me when I travel, particularly in unfamiliar areas or overseas. I commend the company’s efforts, and I anxiously await improvements to the technology and reductions in the cost. Nima is a great beginning to addressing a serious health and quality-of-life issue for people like me for whom gluten-free isn’t a fad but a necessity. For the time being, it’s a valuable, somewhat fickle and costly ally for celiacs.

Source: The sample for this review was provided by Nima. Please visit their site for more info.

 

Product Information

Price: $199 US (was $279); 12 capsules $72.95 US (subscriptions available)
Manufacturer: Nima
Pros:
  • Works as advertised
  • Can save you from much unpleasantness
  • Simple to use
Cons:
  • Prone to errors
  • Unit expensive
  • One-time use capsules expensive

Filed in categories: Reviews

Tagged:

Nima Portable Gluten Sensor review originally appeared on The Gadgeteer on August 18, 2017 at 9:01 am.

Note: If you are subscribed to this feed through FeedBurner, please switch to our native feed URL http://the-gadgeteer.com/feed/ in order to ensure continuous delivery.